Table of contents

Its quite something, multi-billion dollar industries and they all have such pathetic test sample sizes. As previously reported on pfizer, AZ and Moderna all having such pathetic and unscientific studies, tiny sample groups, monitoring of very few subjects not to mention not actually testing the symptomatic, pregnant or immunocompromised. I mean how this qualifies as "science" I just don't know anymore.

Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine NVX-CoV2373 in Younger and Older Adults
Background NVX-CoV2373 is a recombinant severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (rSARS-CoV-2) nanoparticle vaccine composed of trimeric full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins and Matrix-M1 adjuvant. Methods The phase 2 component of our randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1-2 trial was designed…
Approximately 750 participants were planned to be randomized in each country. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) in a blinded manner to one of five vaccine groups (groups A, B, C, D, and E) according to pre-generated randomization schedules with two-factor, two-level stratification employed (ages 18-59 and 60-84 years; study site) (Fig. 1). As a safety measure, enrollment of older participants was initially limited to approximately 50 participants in each of the five vaccine groups until reactogenicity was observed for 5 days with no safety concerns.

750 sounds more reasonable, but then you read they only "monitored" 50 of them.

I mean, how this qualifies as "the science", its really really.. bizarre

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2026920

Of the 131 participants who received injections, 23 received placebo (group A), 25 received 25-μg doses of rSARS-CoV-2 (group B), 29 received 5-μg doses of rSARS-CoV-2 plus Matrix-M1, including three sentinels (group C), 28 received 25-μg doses of rSARS-CoV-2 plus Matrix-M1, including three sentinels (group D), and 26 received a single 25-μg dose of rSARS-CoV-2 plus Matrix-M1 followed by a single dose of placebo (group E).

References

Moderna - mRNA Experimental Use Only
https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/eua-fact-sheet-providers.pdf Specifically page 4 > The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine may not protect all vaccine recipients.there are tones of tidbits in this document.. for example > COVID-19 was defined based on the following criteria: The participant mu…
Pfizer - mRNA, Emergency Use Only
https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download > Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may not protect all vaccine recipients.Pfizer drops India vaccine application after regulator seeks local trialPfizerInc said on Friday it had withdrawn an application for emergency-useauthorisation of its COVID-19 vacc…
Johnson & Johnson, AstraZenaca - standard vaccination vector, both on hold
strange that, the only non mRNA “vaccines” are now on hold not that the new about the clotting before it started being used... but yknow...they did Adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia: the role of von Willebrand factor andP-selectin in mediating accelerated platelet clearance - PubMedThrombocyto…