Table of contents

NSW Supreme Court; evidence against "Brad `Health` Hazzard" for fraud and deceit of the Australian Public with regards to Covid-19 and vaccination genocide in Australia

The NSW Supreme Court does not allow youtube to retain its videos and sets them immediately to "private" thus preventing any public review of proceedings!

Thus we endeavour to preserve it for posterity and for the sake of the record and to stick a finger up to the malicious prevention of public review of cases that will affect them.

Please send me an email if you have more input on this topic.

Update: Unfortunately, we've decided to remove the videos until a later stage. This is to ensure that the access to live video is not compromised. Sorry but these videos need to be preserved for dissection later and to look for any issues in the legal proceedings.

Professor Kristine Macartney

  • Kept trying to use the Alpha Variant efficacy of 64% (assumed) against new Delta Variant evidence which cannot be admitted simply because "delta" is not "alpha" and its data is irrelevant
  • Kept saying that only live viruses are recommended to not be taken by pregnant woman, but this is a brand new mRNA "spike" and we have nil data on the effect on the unborn.
  • Refuses that Israeli data proves the vaccine is not viable as 80% are vaccinated, completely ignores that the case and death rate is now higher than this same time last year
  • Is more transmissible but less dangerous
  • Kept citing the "party Science" that Moderna and AZ studies.... by those corporations prove that.. that is not Science dear that is the companies producing their own documentation.. to call that science is laughable
  • "Clarke" quotes a study showing vax doesn’t protect you from getting it and she gives her opinion- I don’t agree or I wouldn’t characterise it like that and then they move on.. so  "in her opinion" no counter argument
  • She uses allot of "I think" in my opinion with no backed up data and constantly cites the alpha studies against delta cases.. which is WRONG
  • "significant"... "highly effective".. except.. they are not.. 98% is now somewhere from 39% (just above the minimum required for it to be considered) to around 60% which is questionable.. notice the consistent use of the propaganda words.. "highly effective"...
  • constant use of the word.. say it enough even when the evidence says otherwise.. somehow clears the brain..
  • :significantly.. how ? how effective.. how is that calculated? whats does significant mean?
  • 38% ... 60% ? how are you calculating if a patient is not experiencing covid as they would have done anyway... its a complete here-say
  • Please read more about this Bad Professors corruption and capture by taking literally tens of millions in grants in the last 2 years
Unfortunately, we've removed the video so-as not to endanger the proceedings.

Marianne Gale

  • very flustered, lots of here-say
  • no body of evidence provided
  • completely anecdotal and a waste of time
  • Judge question to witness "did you effectively take it as an assumption in giving your evidence that the cv vx reduced transmission of delta rather than evaluate that proposition yourself?"
  • Cites the Dougherty Modelling. Which is not based in science but technology
  • ended abruptly after 20 minutes or so
Unfortunately, we've removed the video so-as not to endanger the proceedings.

Breaking Prof Kristine Macartney is corrupt and took tens of millions in grants in the last 2 years

Corruption - Professor Kristine Macartney NSW Expert Witness received millions in grant monies
Don’t Look now but Prof Kristine Macartney got a shittone of cash in the last 2 years. If this is not corruption then what the fuck is? The Bad Professor is an expert witness in the legal case against “Brad Health Hazzard” in the case against mandatory vaccination in Australia.

Breaking Professor Kristine Macartney called out for be mis-informed and mis-informing the Court

email outing the good professor
part 2

Just remember this is not about Health this is about corporate profits at the expense of public health

Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: ‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?

Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: ‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?’
Goldman Sachs warns sales from the most successful disease treatments are difficult to maintain.
oh look... mRNA is the topic here
“The potential to deliver ‘one shot cures’ is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy and gene editing. However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies,” analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note to clients Tuesday. “While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow.”


Professor Kristine McCartney | Medcast
Professor Kristine McCartney educator page
Marianne Gale’s research works | UNSW Sydney, Kensington (UNSW) and other places
Marianne Gale’s 5 research works with 41 citations and 328 reads, including: Demographic and geographical risk factors for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in greater Western Sydney, 2003-2013
clearly interested in HIV and sex transmitted diseases... weird right

The doherty institute work and get funding from PATH GAVI and BillyGoatsAndHisWife Foundation no conflict of interest to be seen here.