No, sorry they are not safe and you are very clearly lying.
In medical science "safety, is a function of data-points over time"... if enough data points survive over a specified period of time, then a treatment can be nominated as "Safe".
Not enough time has passed to call this crap "safe" and it's clearly not the 93% effective we were all promised.
Serial winker, "Victor Dominello" proud of his digital "inclusion".. card.. can the double-think get any more obvious?
Garrr me hearties! Shiver me timbers it didn’t even hurt!
Stop believing the lies.. There is something else going on here
Just ask: Victor "I don't care if you want to see your dying grandma in the hospital, stay at home" Dominello